filed under: crime & liability
The experience on 372 trails
While rail-trails are hugely popular and successfulonce they are open, during the development phase trailpromoters often have to answer a wide range of concernsthat local residents may have about the impact of the pro-posed trail on their community. Stories of trails attractingdrug dealers, murderers and rapists are perpetuated bytrail opponents with only a handful of newspaper head-lines to back up their assertions rather than empiricalresearch. Despite numerous studies that have concludedrail-trails do not generate crime, concerns persist and fearof the unknown continues to provide fertile ground fortrail opponents. The research that has been conducted,along with anecdotal evidence, suggests that converting anabandoned rail corridor to a trail actually tends to reducecrime by cleaning up the landscape and attracting peoplewho use the trail for recreation and transportation.
Recognizing the need to address these concerns, Rails-to-Trails Conservancy (RTC) conducted a survey of all rail-trail managers in aneffort to document the level of crime on trails and identify the mitigation measuresused by trail designers and managers. The objectives of this study were threefold:1) to document the levels of crime on urban, suburban and rural rail-trails withcurrent statistics and comprehensive data, 2) to examine trail management strategies that can mitigate crime and improve trail safety, and 3) to put crime on trailsin perspective. A summary of past studies, our methodology, results, recommendations and several case studies follow.
Published January 01, 1998
This study investigates the question of whether the presence of a greenway increases the risk of crime occurring on the properties adjacent to the greenway.
Using multiple analytical approaches, our study showed that creation of Chicago’s 606 was associated with decreases in violent, property, and disorderly crimes between 2011 and 2015
The Courts and the Legislature have expressed a clear policy to permit the use of available recreational property, both public and private, in its natural condition, without placing the burden and expense of altering the property and defending claims for injuries on the landowner.