filed under: wildlife and environment
Planning Trails with Wildlife in Mind
Many longer trails cross from one jurisdiction to another. This has ramifications for how the trail is planned and specifically how wildlife issues are considered.
If a trail will cross federal lands, a more careful environmental analysis may be required. Federal agencies, such as the USDA Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management have their own environmental review processes in most cases. These agencies also have land management plans that identify where they believe trails should and should not go.
It is important early on in a trails project to contact the federal, state, and local agencies with jurisdiction over lands you are considering. This is not just because they manage the land and have the ultimate say as to what happens, but also because they most likely have important wildlife information and knowledgeable experts.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) outlines an environmental review process for reviewing projects proposed with federal lands or funds. NEPA can seem intimidating to those first encountering it. (Contact the manager of the federal property early in the process for advice.) Because the NEPA process would have been followed for an adopted federal forest or other land management plan, it may be possible that additional environmental review is not needed for a specific trail project. Often reconstruction or minor trail rerouting may be approved under existing NEPA documentation, without the need for additional review.
In general, the smaller and less intrusive the trail project on federal lands, the quicker the environmental review. The public scoping process (by which issues and concerns are identified) may be more lengthy if a trail is perceived as controversial.
As early in the trail planning process as feasible, contact the owners of private lands in the general area of your proposed trail. Out of respect for private property, it is good to communicate with these community members from the beginning of the project.
L.1 Existing plans.
Propose trails on federal lands in areas identified as suitable in existing management plans.
L.2 Additional requirements.
ScBe prepared to follow a more formal environmental review process if you are proposing a trail on federal land. You may want to start working with the responsible agency a year in advance of proposed construction.
L.3 Practical advice.
Interview a person who already has been through the NEPA process for a trail project similar to yours. (Talk with the Bureau of Land Management or U.S. Forest Service, for example.).
Typical information needed for trail system analysis on lands managed by the USDA Forest Service includes:
1. Is there an approved plan for the area?
2. What are the general goals of the Forest Plan as they relate to the area?
3. What specific Forest Plan management objectives and prescriptions have been designated for the area? What other resource activities are likely to take place?
4. Within those prescriptions, what standards and guidelines might affect trail system design, operation, and administration?
[Older publications may be available from libraries and used booksellers. Titles with links may still be in print.]
Shipley Environmental, Applying the NEPA Process. Telephone: 801-298-7800.
Published September 2018
Fort River Birding and Nature Trail
The Fort River Birding and Nature Trail is a universally accessible trail. It was presented with the 2014 Paul Winske Access Award by the Stavros Center for Independent Living.
Designing Sustainable Off-Highway Vehicle Trails
Proper management of off-highway vehicle (OHV) trails is one of the most important tasks for trail managers today.
Hiking, mountain biking and equestrian use in natural areas
A recreation ecology literature review
Sustaining Wildlife With Recreation on Public Lands
A Synthesis of Research Findings, Management Practices, and Research Needs
