Planning Trails with Wildlife in Mind
Encouraging visitors to stay on the trail is the most important issue, and is made easier by providing attractive, well-designed trail systems. Managers should also identify populations of plants that have been designated as threatened, endangered, or sensitive.
The most readily observable impact of trail recreationists is to vegetation near trails. While these impacts tend to be very localized, they have broader implications because they alter habitat conditions and, in turn, affect wildlife. In most cases, however, these impacts to vegetation are much less than the trampling that results when there is no trail to channel people.
Of special concern should be impacts to plants that have been designated as threatened, endangered, or sensitive.
If recreationists don’t stay on trails, they tend to:
• reduce the density of plants near a trail by trampling and picking;
• compact soil and contribute to erosion;
• alter the composition of species by damaging existing plants, creating bare spots that favor exotic species, the seeds of which are introduced by trail users and their pack animals; and
• in the process, change the vertical structure and spatial pattern of vegetation.
The conditions along trails also can allow weedy, exotic plants to invade natural areas. Weeds are a problem because frequently they are more aggressive than native species and yet don’t provide the habitat that wildlife get from native species. (Typically, weeds are also less successful at inhibiting soil erosion than native plants.)
Recovery times from trampling vary widely with habitat type,with alpine ecosystems some of the slowest to recover.
In alpine ecosystems, herbaceous meadows are most quickly modified by walking, fellfields with cushion forms are less affected, and turf meadows are least affected of all. Heavy trampling will destroy a turf ecosystem in eight weeks, while a rock-desert (fellfield) will be destroyed in only two weeks.
I.1 Keeping users on trails.
In areas with sensitive vegetation, provide a well-designed trail to encourage users to stay on the trail. Use signs, educational materials, and even barriers as appropriate.
I.2 Native plants.
In natural areas, use native plants in revegetat- ing along trails because these are the plants wildlife depend upon.
I.3 Weed-free feed.
Require use of weed-free feed for horses and other pack animals so they don’t spread weeds along trails.
I.4 User education.
Educate trail users about the results of direct impacts to vegetation and indirect impacts to wildlife.
Provide toilets at trail-heads and other key locations to reduce damage to surrounding vegetation.
I.6 Weed control. To prevent weed spread, control aggressive weeds along trails, especially at trail-heads.
Design trails with proper drainage and sustainable gradients so users are less likely to trample vegetation along alternate routes.
I.8 Wet areas.
Route a trail around meadows and other wet areas and build up a dry trail in areas where seasonal water creates boggy soil.
I.9 Improving existing trails.
To minimize ground disturbance and possible spread of weedy species, reconstruct an existing trail instead of rerouting it.
[Older publications may be available from libraries and used booksellers. Titles with links may still be in print.]
Cole and Landres. “Indirect Effects of Recreation on Wildlife,”in Knight, R. and K. Gutzwiller, eds., 1995. Wildlife and Recreationists: Coexistence through Management and Research. Island Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 183-202.
Cole, “Minimizing Conflict between Recreation and Nature Conservation,” in Smith, D. and P. Hellmund, 1993. Ecology of Greenways. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minn., pp. 105-122.
A Conservation Guidebook For Communities Along The Appalachian National Scenic Trail
Specific skills used in management of natural resources that host trails and greenways: monitoring impacts of visitors and natural processes; acquisition and protection of trail corridors; conservation and restoration of habitat and natural areas.
A study shows that from 2014 to 2018, there was a $6.8 million gap between trail projects proposed to RTP and funding awarded.
The Wildlife and Trail Planning Checklist is a sequence of wildlife-related questions and possible steps to consider in planning a trail.