Can trails and bikeways compete with other transportation priorities?
by Stuart Macdonald, Trail Consultant, American Trails
We suddenly have a brave new world for federal funding of bicycling and walking facilities. Most people thought the programs we depend on would just keep getting renewed. The good news is there is still broad eligibility for trails and bikeways. The bad news is there is more potential competition for less money, and the States can simply opt out of the programs.
The Recreational Trails Program is specifically funded at $85 million a year for two years. But again, individual States can choose to spend their money on other eligible projects. It will be very interesting to see how different States address the opportunity.
Now we have to ask a question we’ve been putting off: can trails and bikeways compete with other transportation priorities? Do bike/ped facilities still need the “affirmative action” of set-aside funding? We see the benefits of “complete streets,” of more kids walking to school, and more accessible communities. But are the public interest groups and our elected officials convinced? Have we made a compelling case for the economic benefits of trails and bikeways?
Steve Lettau, commenting on the new bill for the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals, notes that funding will be available to those who “embrace walking and bicycling as sound transportation policy.” We will need to learn from those successes, he writes: “Government bodies that wisely use transportation funding for walking and bicycling will reap rewards and serve as a model to those policy makers who’ve missed the myriad value of making such investments.”
There are lots of opportunities for funding bike/ped projects. But we will all have to get a fast and thorough education from those who are successful gladiators in the funding arena. We will hear more voices like House Speaker John Boehner, who said the new bill would “allow us to focus our highway dollars on fixing America’s highways, not planting more flowers around the country.” We’re going to find out whether our arguments and evidence are convincing.
— Stuart Macdonald, American Trails Magazine and website editor
The 2016-2021 Strategic Agenda for Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation builds on 25 years of progress toward increasing walking and biking safety and activity throughout the United States. The 1994 National Bicycling and Walking Study: Transportation Choices for Changing America set the stage for advancing safe, accessible, comfortable, and well-used pedestrian and bicycle transportation networks, with a focus on increasing trips and reducing injuries and fatalities.
This resource highlights ways that different communities have mapped their existing and proposed bicycle networks. It shows examples of maps at different scales, while also demonstrating a range of mapping strategies, techniques, and approaches. Facility types represented on the respective maps and legends are each different because they represent a community’s unique context and needs.
The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) recently began studying the ways in which bicycling, for transportation and in combination with transit, can reduce automobile use and lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The first of these focused studies concentrated on the Metro Orange Line and parallel bicycle path. This Bicycle Rail Trip Analysis and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Study looks more broadly at bicycle trips to and from Metro Rail. The purpose of this study is to establish the benefits of providing an integrated transportation system where bicyclists are accommodated at train stations and on trains.
The purpose of this research was to provide a methodology to evaluate how intermodal connections between public transportation and public trails can improve livability in Florida communities.