filed under: health and social benefits
Eight Common Measures
Parks and trail corridors have been important for public health in the United States for more than 100 years.
To improve the health and lives of all Americans, community leaders, decision makers, researchers, public health professionals, and park and recreation professionals have been working together to promote the public health benefits of parks and trails. Active Living Research, funded in part by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, has been a national leader in validating the positive public health benefits of parks and trails, and has been awarding research grants in this area since 2001. Reports based on those grants can be found on their website (www.activelivingresearch.org) and provide guidance that might be helpful in applying the measures in this summary. The focus of this summary is the further development and promotion of common measures typically associated with park and trail infrastructure and that provide ways to systematically evaluate and enhance their health benefits. The measures grew out of the NCSU/NPS/CDC collaborative research project mentioned at the beginning of this summary.
Common measures are needed for many reasons. The “Bicycling and Walking in the United States: 2010 Benchmarking Report” states “What isn’t counted, doesn’t count” and that “In order to improve something, there must be a means to measure it” (Alliance for Biking and Walking 2010). The Benchmarking Report was created to give biking and pedestrian advocates a framework to plan, set goals, and track progress. It also helps coordinate efforts by diverse partners. Common measures are just as important for parks and trails. Without the data the measures generate it is impossible to learn what does and does not work well; set goals, plan strategies, and evaluate results; make data-based decisions; or make a strong case for needed changes in infrastructure and funding.
The purpose of this project is to suggest common measures for park and trail systems that are grounded in public health goals such as easier access to parks or trails and increased physical activity. Common measures can highlight the positive impact that park access and use have on community health which,
in turn, emphasizes the importance of local parks and trails to community decision makers and funders. At a local level, data from common measures can help agencies make strategic decisions about park and trail facilities that can increase the public health benefits of facilities. These data can be used
to identify trends and compare different approaches to park and trail design and management.
Most local park and recreation agencies lack resources, time, and internal analytical skills to conduct proper data analysis (NRPA 2016). To help address the potential lack of resources, park and recreation agencies could collaborate with public health professionals to collect and analyze park access and use data so that park planning, design, and management can better address community health outcomes and achieve shared goals.
Published August 03, 2017
This manuscript explains how mountain biking is related to public health and the issues underlying trail access in the United States.
In recent years, competitive mountain biking has attracted the interest of sport scientists, and a small but growing number of physiological studies have been published. The aim of this review is to provide a synthesis of this literature and directions for future research.
This study identifies the economic and health impacts of bicycling in Iowa.
The primary purpose of this paper is to identify and review studies evaluating the effectiveness of programs to increase access to trails and trails use (physical activity) among youth from under-resourced communities.